Relief for the Few

 

 

 

LATIN AMERICA Jun 30, 2005

G8’s debt relief criteria draw harsh criticism.
Lucy Hurn. 

The Group of Eight countries announced a historic deal June 11 to cancel the debt owed by 18 of some of the world’s poorest nations, among them Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras and Nicaragua.

The agreement, which was announced by British Chancellor Gordon Brown ahead of the G8 Summit, which will take place in Scotland July 6-8, means that the G8 – the governments of the world’s wealthiest countries, plus Russia – have agreed to relieve the 18 of the 42 HIPC (highly indebted poor countries) of US$40 billion debt.

The deal will free the countries of a total of $1.5 billion in annual debt repayments. According to Mario Arana, the Nicaraguan Finance Minister, the money "can be assigned to a use of greater priority for a country with enormous social demands and necessities." President Bharrat Jagdeo of Guyana said the deal will allow his country to continue "investing in education, housing, and health care; creating better infrastructure, reducing poverty, and generating more employment".

Church and campaign groups have pressured governments for such a debt relief package that has been under debate for more than 10 years, but made very little headway until now.

Economic evaluations insufficient

Nevertheless, the deal has generated much criticism. Countries are given HIPC status based on narrow economic indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. However, evaluating economies on a macroeconomic level fails to account for Latin America’s extreme economic inequality, meaning that high levels of poverty are averaged out by wealth that is concentrated in very few hands.

Peru, for example, is classified as a middle-income country, and therefore, does not qualify for debt relief. This is in spite of the fact that over half the country’s population lives in poverty (less than $2 per day), 25 percent lives in extreme poverty (less than $1 per day). In addition, Peru’s total foreign debt accounts for 46 percent of its GDP and debt service absorbs 20 percent of the national budget.

Within the list of the 24 remaining HIPC countries waiting to receive debt relief, there are no other Latin American nations. The G8 announcement reaffirms the body’s belief in this evaluation system, even though as Rocío Valdeavellano from the Jubilee Network Peru, said, "there are other countries that also deserve debt relief."

The Jubilee Network is an international debt relief campaign, with members in more than 70 nations.

Haiti’s exclusion from the list was highly criticized and, according to Jubilee South — comprised of members in over 40 African, Asian and Latin American countries — despite suffering a great humanitarian crisis, Haiti "not only continues to be excluded from these proposals, but in addition, the international financial institutions continue charging regardless."

Criteria questioned

Many have called into question the HIPC model on which the deal is based. In order to qualify, countries must follow a series of measures to combat corruption and "the elimination of impediments to private investment". Throughout Latin America, the privatization model has often led to greater suffering, especially within poorer sectors.

According to the Honduran Social Forum for External Debt and Development, the imposition of economic measures in order to meet the conditions for debt cancellation has been "achieved at the expense of an increase in poverty". Civic society groups are calling for the right of developing countries to decide their own economic agenda, rather than having one imposed through conditionality. The call is echoed by the British government which made a series of announcements last March declaring that "developing countries [should not be] forced to liberalize through external pressure".

Another hurdle facing Latin American countries is that while the deal proposes to cancel all debts owed to the World Bank (WB), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the African Development Bank, those owed to the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) or the Andean Development Corporation (CAF) will not be cancelled.

According to President Jagdeo, Guyana will be relieved of $336.6 million in debt, but will still owe the IDB $446 million. In a similar case, the sum Bolivia owes the WB and IMF accounts for only 41 percent of its total debt, according to Bolpress.

The debt announcement has also been criticized for the risk that it may reduce pressure on G8 countries to meet the commitment they made to raise official development assistance (ODA) to 0.7 percent of their GDP by 2015 (a target only currently met by a handful of small European nations and a underachievement by the United States, which in 2004 only gave 0.16 percent).

In addition there are already signs that ODA budgets will be used to meet debt cancellation commitments, meaning a further depletion in budgets already stretched thin by the tsunami disaster and involvement in Iraq. Latin America is already experiencing a recent pattern of ODA withdrawal, again due to rationale based around GDP and average income.

In November 2003 the British Department for International Development decided to close programs in "middle income" countries such as Peru, and last April, the Canadian International Development Agency announced that it will focus its ODA on just 25 countries (within Latin America just the same four countries are due to benefit from debt cancellation).

Another point of contention is that the world’s most powerful are also failing to address one of the biggest development obstacles: the tariffs and subsidies that stop developing countries’ from being able to compete in the markets of the developed world. Instead, free trade negotiations, for example, between the United States and Central American or Andean countries, and European negotiations with their former Caribbean colonies, concentrate on the opening of Latin American markets rather than reciprocal action by United States and Europe. As Steve Tibbett from the Make Poverty History campaign, UK member of the Global Campaign Against Poverty, says that "trade is the biggest issue, where there is the deepest unfairness — it is the root of the problem".