Case against Patenting - Food

 

 

 

Case against Patenting Food

Impoverishing farmers
The patenting of seeds gives enormous economic power to a small number of agribusiness corporations and they sell their wares on the global market. These will not be cheap. The insect-resistant maize hybrid produced by Pioneer Hi-Breed requires access to 38 different patents controlled by 16 different patent holders. In addition farmers will be forced to pay royalties on succeeding generations of plants and animals that they buy or produce. It will be illegal to save seeds from the previous harvest without permission and payment, and this will make farmers totally dependent on the corporations. The impact on Third World countries will be devastating. It will lead to a further flow of financial resources from the South to the North, and, in the process, institutionalise the dependence of Southern agriculture on Northern corporations. The flow of scientific information and new agricultural technologies will be concentrated in the hands of these corporations.

Corporations controlling staple food crops
If biodiversity continues to be privatised for the exclusive benefit of Northern corporations, this will give them control over the food supply of our world. At present, 10 corporations control 32% of the commercial seed market, valued at $23 billion, and 100% of the market for genetically engineered seeds. Also, with massive resources being channelled into biotechnology, financial support for traditional crops and farming methods is tiny.

Unsustainable agriculture
Patents promote unsustainable and inequitable agricultural policies. A disastrous decline in genetic diversity could result from patenting crop species. The development of genetically uniform organisms is preferred by the agribusiness corporations because it is then easier for them to maintain their patent claims. Biotech companies holding broad spectrum patents on food crops encourage farmers to grow modified varieties with promises of greater yields and disease resistance. However, numerous examples world-wide show that the "improved" crops have failed to yield according to corporate promises, and have led to a diminishing of the rich diversity of traditional crop varieties.

False promises for the poor
The biotech industry boasts that genetically engineered rice could help prevent blindness among poor children. Millions of public funding went into developing this technology which was hailed as proof that biotechnology would help feed and supplement the diet of the poor who might be lacking in Vitamin A. The researchers, Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer, who developed the transgenic beta-carotene enhanced rice were so afraid of the complexities of patent negotiations that they quickly signed the publicly-funded technology to AstraZeneca (now Syngenta), one of the world's largest agrochemical and biotech companies. Already there are some 70 patents on the so-called "golden rice", whose efficacy appears to be grossly exaggerated.

Suffering of animals
Attempts have been made to genetically engineer fish, cattle, sheep, pigs and chickens to increase their growth rates, have lower fat levels, and more tolerance of diseases common to overcrowded and unhygienic factory farms. Also being researched are pigs and poultry that are more docile and better suited to intensive farming conditions, and even featherless chickens that do not need to be plucked. In sheep, incorporation of human and bovine growth hormone genes has resulted in disrupted joint development and a diabetes-like condition, suppression of appetite and a shortened lifespan.


In West Africa the brazzein berry is renowned for its sweetness. This berry is much sweeter than sugar and, unlike other non-sugar sweeteners, it does not lose its taste when heated. This makes it an ideal candidate for the sugar-free food industry which is worth about $100 billion a year.

A U.S. researcher from the University of Wisconsin who saw people and animals eating the berry applied for a U.S. and European patent on the protein isolated from the berry. The drive to create a genetically engineered organism to produce brazzein is under way. This will eliminate the need to grow the berry in West Africa.


Did you know?

  • Soy beans are the leading GM crop - 46% of the total land under soy beans grows GM varieties. The EU is trying to insist that GM soya from the U.S. is labelled so that consumers have the choice of avoiding it.
  • Monsanto accounted for 91% of the global area sown to genetically modified seeds in 2000. The world's best-selling weedkiller is Monsanto's Roundup. Farmers who grow the corporation's GM soybeans sign a contract which opens them to prosecution if they use any herbicide formulation other than Roundup.
  • In India, farmers using Monsanto's GM seeds pay at least $50 per acre as a "technical fee" over and above the price of the seed.
  • Because most genes being introduced into GM plants come from sources which have never been part of the human diet, there is no way of knowing currently whether or not any health risks are involved, such as susceptibilty to allergic reactions.
  • In June 2002 the US succeeded in getting the World Food Summit in Rome to endorse genetically modifed crops as a solution to world hunger.
BACK TO TOP